Kubrick wrote the screenplay himself and he managed to retain enough of the book's unique language to give the film a sense of the novel's style. Burgess wasn't happy that Kubrick dropped the events of the final chapter of his novel but I feel that movie's ending is more effective. Overall, a challenging adaptation for which Kubrick was rightly rewarded with an Oscar nomination.
As for the direction (also Oscar-nominated), Kubrick delivered a typically outstanding effort. His direction is arguably as dexterous as Burgess's prose. The cinematography is also stunning while the score, which is rife with classical music, is memorable as well.
As far as acting goes, this is Malcolm McDowell's picture. That's not to say that the supporting actors are forgettable (they aren't); he just delivers a towering performance that few could hope to match. The fact that he was denied an Oscar nomination for his work is nothing short of mind-boggling.
I drink milk plus
ReplyDeleteHipster movie of the century.
ReplyDeleteGreatest movie ever. Ever.
ReplyDelete/story
Still gotta watch it..
ReplyDeleteI have not seen this yet, but I've been recommended to read the book first, and I think I'll take that approach.
ReplyDeleteI'm weirded out to say that you actually got me interested, no, really. I would had NEVER looked into anything mildly old on my own. EVER.
ReplyDeleteDidn't watch it yet:( CFC
ReplyDeleteFantastic movie, the version of Beethoven's 9th symphony from the film is also one of my favourite bits of music.
ReplyDeleteI've seen it a couple times
ReplyDeletenot sure why people are so obsessed with it
The key point behind this film: is it better to choose to be evil, rather than to be forced to be good. Anthony Burgess and Stanley Kubrick are geniuses.
ReplyDeleteAh, seen this one a while ago. One of those movies that get stuck in your head for a long time. Might watch it again now that you reminded me of it..
ReplyDeleteThis film is weird. Can't get myself to watch it ...
ReplyDelete